Intensive Silviculture |
|
Intensive Silvicultural Practices
After a new crop of trees has been established and reaches a free
growing condition, the future timber and other resource values
of the forest stand can be further enhanced by intensive silvicultural
practices.
Any given stand has a limited capability to produce an annual
volume of timber, when the site is fully occupied by trees; pre-commercial
thinning accentuates the volume production on fewer trees and
trees of desired species. It is usually done manually using brush
and chain saws or mechanically with tractor-mounted flails or
saws. PCT homogenizes the stand, increases mean tree size, and
lowers the age at which the stand can be harvested. The practice
is difficult to mechanize and is very expensive; more than one
person-day per hectare is commonly required. In spite of its high
cost, this practice is common. Accelerated harvest of younger
stands often allows for accelerated harvest of older overmature
stands in a forest management unit, thus yielding more than enough
revenue to pay for a PCT program. PCT also reduces logging costs
and increases product values. Wildlife habitat and landscape values
are often improved. Without PCT treatment, stands on lower-fertility
sites may never be operable. Stands may be left at final crop
density or may be designed to allow for one or more commercial
thinnings. The practice is called pre-commercial since it is done shortly after crown closure, the time at which the available crown space has become fully occupied. The trees are relatively small and there is no market for the cut trees.
Up to 30% of the total volume production in a stand can be lost
due to competition-induced mortality (smaller trees in dense stands
die because there is not enough growing space for all of them).
Commercial thinning attempts to recover this mortality loss and
to provide early income from a stand by harvesting trees big enough
to have product value. In practice, it is almost impossible to
recover all potential loss through mortality because repeated
light thinnings are necessary if residual stand volumes sufficient
to maintain stand growth rates are left after each thinning.
Because of present Canadian market conditions and the high logging
cost of thinnings, most of the repeated light thinnings desired
are unmarketable and too expensive; even a single thinning may
not be economical. Commercial thinnings are more likely to be
economical if the stand has had density control at establishment
or by subsequent precommercial thinnings. Currently, very little
commercial thinning is done in Canada, primarily due to unsuitable
stand densities and species, high logging costs, and low stumpage
values. Pruning and Shearing
After stands have been reduced in density to the point where valuable
final crop trees can be identified at an early age, pruning is
possible. Pruning increases the value of individual trees by prematurely
removing the lower branches so that clear wood, free of knots,
is laid down around an unpruned knotty core. Several valuable
tree species have branches that do not rot off readily and remain
persistently on the tree even after death due to shading.
Dead and live branches are cut off flush with the trunk using
manual handsaws; mechanization is very difficult. Repeated prunings
are needed to maintain a cylindrical knotty core and yet not remove
too much live crown.
Pruning is very expensive; for it to be economical the increase
in stumpage value of clear timber over knotty timber must be great
and the stand must have been thinned. Since these conditions are
rare in Canada, pruning is little practiced. As more and more
PCT-treated stands accumulate and as supplies of clear old-growth
timber diminish, pruning will become more economically attractive.
The practice requires a 20- or 30-year lead time before clear
wood in sufficient quantities is produced by a tree. The most
common species pruned are white pine and Douglas fir.
Shearing is the practice used in Christmas tree culture: a shaping
of the form of the tree to make it more salable. It is usually
done with sharp knife blades. Pine trees are treated while in
candle, that is, while the leaders are growing. Other conifers
are treated after bud formation. Timber Stand Improvement (TSI)
Timber stand improvementÛcutting down or poisoning all deformed
and unwanted trees within older standsÛis usually done in
previously untended hardwood stands containing valuable trees
mixed with less valuable ones. It is usually a noncommercial practice,
in that no revenue is generated, although some fuelwood may be
produced. The objective is to concentrate the growing capacity
of the site on the most valuable trees, without excessive growing-stock
reduction and loss of growth. Eastern Canada has very extensive
areas of tolerant hardwood forests, often previously subjected
to cuttings that removed the most valuable trees and left the
least valuable. Such stands are of low quality and should be treated
by TSI practices. Currently, TSI is little practiced because of
the high cost and lack of immediate return. Fertilizing and Drainage
The growth rates of individual trees and stands can be increased
by providing additional supplies of limiting nutrient elements.
In contrast to agricultural crops, forest ecosystems recycle nutrients;
however, many forest stands are mainly limited by their nutrient
supply, rather than by their climate, temperature, or moisture
regime.
Granular fertilizers are spread by helicopter on designated forest
stands, an expensive practice. Because of the high cost of the
extra fertilizer-grown wood, the fertilized trees must be final
crop (the stand thinned to final crop density) and the stumpage
values high. In addition, there may need to be a shortage of stand
volumes in certain forest age classes in a management unit. It
is essential that the forest stand be known to be responsive to
such treatment.
Most stands are fertilized after crown closure, usually at final
crop density. Some fertilizing at the time of planting or immediately
after planting is also done. To be successful, vegetation management
is required, together with accurate diagnostic tests of regeneration
nutrient status.
Drainage of forest sites, especially organic soils, has a great
potential to improve stand growth. Although it is widely practiced
in the boreal forests of Finland, where timber and growing sites
are in short supply, it is used only experimentally in Canada,
usually in black spruce muskeg conditions. The practice requires
large forest ploughs or specially designed backhoes. The distance
and depth of drainage ditches must be carefully matched to the
organic matter classification and hydrological characteristics
.
Special Silvicultural Practices
Most of the previous intensive silvicultural practices are used
to enhance timber production. In addition, there are cultural
practices designed to attain other objectives. Seed Orchard Management
Designed to maximize cone production, the practices involved in
seed orchard management are drainage to control soil moisture;
standpipe mist irrigation to delay bud formation until local pollen
sources have gone; repeated nitrogen fertilizing and basal scarring
to stimulate female flower bud formation; radical top shearing
for convenience of cone picking; and cross-pollination breeding
and progeny testing followed by roguing. Nursery Management
These techniques are not considered silvicultural practices. They
are numerous and complex and many are considered to be more horticulture
than silviculture. Recreation and Landscape Silviculture TSI, PCT, and CT and vegetation management practices are applied to meet the needs of tourist campers, hikers, and motorists in parks, recreation areas, and commercial timber forests. Landscape design criteria often require a major modification of the cut-block layout and influence the choice of silvicultural system and even of species for planting. Pruning of trees along roadsides in forests provides views into stands. Forests stands are deliberately manipulated by silvicultural practices to improve wildlife habitat. Stand-level practices include PCT, CT, and fertilizing to encourage understory forage production; use of selection silvicultural systems along streams and rivers to protect riparian habitat and keep water temperatures cool; and the retention of snags, dead trees, and wolf trees for nesting. Cutovers, forest meadows, and stands are set on fire to create forage and set back succession. Grass seeding is a common practice on cutovers on open-range situations in western Canada where cattle graze. Silvicultural Surveys and Stand-History Record Keeping One of the essential features of forestry practice is the planning of silvicultural actions in a way that meets the owners' stand management objectives. Planning requires excellent record keeping and monitoring of stand performance by surveys. Silvicultural survey practices include those of regeneration and backlog assessment surveys, plantation surveys, and free-to-grow surveys. All data are entered into stand-history record keeping systems, which are in turn components of forest inventory and planning systems.
Silvicultural surveys of every cutover area are required during
a 10 to 40-year period until the new stand has reached crown closure.
This means an annual workload of 1-3 million hectares of silvicultural
surveys in Canada. These surveys involve fieldwork or the use
of remote-sensing techniques. Fieldwork varies from field walk-throughs
to the sampling of numerous small, temporary and permanent plots
established in grid patterns on cutover areas. The plots are measured
for species frequency; tree density and height; occurrence of
insect, disease, and other damage; and competing brush invasion.
Since most commercial forest land in Canada is under lease for
timber harvesting with a legal obligation for successful regeneration
or free-to-grow status, the silvicultural surveys represent inspections
of performance. Such inspections are done by provincially licensed
or approved silvicultural surveyors in some provinces.
Stand-history record-keeping practices are usually computer-based
storage and retrieval systems on a stand-by-stand basis. These
systems are often linked to a geographic information system (GIS)
and a broader total forest inventory and planning system. Such
systems are maintained and developed by both corporate licensees
and provincial governments. Canada has no national system of stand-history
record keeping. Preparation of Silvicultural Prescriptions
The final major field of silvicultural practices, apart from the
business and legal components of silvicultural contracting is
that of preparing silvicultural prescriptions.
This silvicultural practice involves assessing the stand for growing
stock, stand structure, species composition, fertility and moisture
regime, amount of regeneration, seedbed and seed supply situation,
brush invasion, and landscape, recreation, and wildlife habitat
values; planning stand establishment and crop tending; writing
a detailed prescription; implementing and monitoring the planned
actions at the stand level; and determining the impact on forest-level
objectives. Such formal analyses and prescriptions are mandatory
in some provinces for every cutover area and must be signed by
a professional forester (thousands are required every year). They
have become necessary because of controversies over the use of
forests for multiple purposes, such as timber, recreation, wildlife,
landscape scenery, and nature conservation, and because the biological
variation and complexity of forests do not allow for standardized
successful treatments.
The stand inventory is related to various feasible stand management
alternatives that meet landowners' objectives and are economical.
The best prescription is chosen and a detailed year-by-year plan
of implementation is designed with recommendations on costs and
details of procedure. The whole procedure is similar to the work
done by engineers and architects in design work. The preparation
and implementation of a successful silvicultural prescription
is the ultimate test of the professionalism and ability of a Canadian
silviculturist.
Adapted from publication prepared
by Dr. G. F. Weetman, Professor of Silviculture, University of
British Columbia.
|